诈欺游戏

韩先楚回老家见公社干部几十人，直接给毛主席写信：必须精简,历史看兴衰,原创 韩先楚回老家见公社干部几十人，直接给毛主席写信：必须精简_我的网站

一 |     开国上将韩先楚，外号“旋风司令”，打仗快、狠、准。    

    Drivers queue at a petrol station to refuel in Tehran, on August 25, 2026. Photo: VCG
As military strikes and diplomatic negotiations have both failed to bring an early end to the roughly six‑month‑old US-Iran conflict, Washington rolled out new sanctions against Tehran on Monday local time intended to further strangle its economy. Iran, for its part, has vowed a tougher pushback.
In a news conference on Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent threatened new sanctions on countries refusing to cut economic ties with Iran, following recent rhetoric from Washington threatening an "economic D-Day" for Iran. 
Meanwhile, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) under the US Treasury announced secondary sanctions on nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels in multiple jurisdictions which, according to the US' claims, enable Iran's activities, including so-called nuclear and missile technology procurement, cyber operations, and oil-revenue generation networks.
According to Reuters, those sanctions targeted businesses in China, the UAE, Singapore and several other countries, including a cooking-oil refinery in France, but did not include any of the Chinese financial institutions suspected of facilitating Iran's oil trade.
In response to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent laying out plans for economic asphyxiation of Iran, expanding Washington's secondary sanction threats and warning of dire consequences for countries that do not join the campaign, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said at a press briefing on Tuesday that China has made clear on many occasions its firm opposition to illicit unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or the authorization of the UN Security Council. 
"Economic warfare and maximum pressure provide no solution. On the contrary, they only serve to fuel tensions and lead to risk spillover, which will disrupt the global economic and financial order, and harm the legitimate rights and interests of other countries," the spokesperson said. 
The pressing task is to facilitate the deescalation of the situation and return to dialogue and negotiation as soon as possible, Lin said, adding that China will do everything necessary to firmly safeguard its rights and interests, Lin added. Lin also said China's cooperation with Iran is conducted within the framework of international law, thus should not be disrupted.
When asked whether China has received any such timeline, as the US stated it would give countries a timeline on when to shut down the actions that it has identified, and how China intends to respond to the relevant announcements by the US Treasury involving China-based entities and individuals, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian stated on Tuesday that China is closely following the developments, and will do everything necessary to firmly safeguard our rights and interests.
In May this year, China's Ministry of Commerce issued a blocking ban prohibiting any recognition, enforcement or compliance with US sanctions imposed on five Chinese companies on the grounds of their alleged involvement in Iranian petroleum transactions.
Relying on its financial hegemony and long‑arm jurisdiction, the US enforces unilateral sanctions with no basis in international law. Such measures severely undermine fundamental consensus for international trade and erode the existing international order, Zhou Mi, senior research fellow at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times on Tuesday.
In essence, Washington is imposing its Iran‑focused policies to enterprises across the globe, compelling third‑party actors to fall in line with its diplomatic objectives, Zhou noted.
The latest sanctions would affect a broader range of countries, industries and firms. They will not only draw wider opposition from the international community, but also boomerang on the interests of US‑owned enterprises, he added. 
Fewer levers left 
"We are launching an economic onslaught against Iran's financial connections around the globe," Bessent claimed at a press conference. "Our objective is to sever every economic lifeline" that sustains the country, he said, according to a Treasury release. 
The US Treasury Department said in a release that the new sectoral sanctions determinations target five critical sectors - digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping - that the US claimed Iran has relied on to support its economy.
US Treasury claimed that "any entity that facilitates money laundering or sanctions evasion on behalf of Iran risks being cut off from the US financial system."
OFAC also suspended several general licenses that previously authorized certain remittance payments to Iran and Iranian access to the US cultural and academic system. The office also issued additional guidance on the so-called sanctions risks of bowing to Iranian demands related to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
Mohammad Mokhber, an aide to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, said in an X post on Monday that Iran's response to US sanctions and pressure will be "more decisive than before."
Iranian Economy Minister Ali Madanizadeh said that Tehran "is and was ready," with a two-year plan to counter Washington's new sanctions. He told state television that "it seems they wished to suffer yet another defeat," per an AFP report. 
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf responded in an X post that "the Americans know no one will believe their nonsense," noting that the US is not in a position economically to restrict its relations with other countries. 
Alan Eyre, a distinguished diplomatic fellow at the Middle East Institute, told NBC News that after six months of combat, the US government "has few remaining levers it can use to convince Iran's major trading partners to materially reduce their economic ties."
While Washington's maximum‑pressure campaign may deliver short‑term shocks to Iran's economy, it can hardly "strangle" the country completely, said Liu Zhongmin, a professor at the Middle East Studies Institute of Shanghai International Studies University.
He added that Iran's economic resilience cannot be underestimated. Having borne decades of crippling sanctions from the US and Western nations, Tehran has built substantial experience in sanction‑busting and developed coping mechanisms ranging from basic‑industry self‑reliance and regional trade networks to oil‑for‑goods swaps and non‑US dollar‑denominated trade. Furthermore, the Strait of Hormuz remains a source of strategic leverage for Iran to push back against US pressure.
The expert said that Tehran and Washington are encountering "a battle of wills," and Iran believes the economic costs the US would suffer from a Hormuz blockade would outweigh the damage inflicted on Iran by sanctions.
Washington's "economic strangulation" policy risks ending in failure unless it yields short‑term outcomes, particularly securing the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, Liu added. 
Self-created dilemma
As the US ramps up pressure on Iran, Americans are growing averse to a protracted war.
According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Monday, US ‌public approval of the war with Iran fell to its lowest level since the conflict's early days, with just 31 percent of Americans supporting US military action.
On June 18, the US and Iran signed an MoU, under which the two were scheduled to hold negotiations within a period of 60 days, which ended on August 17, to reach a final agreement. However, the talks' fate remains unclear following renewed escalation between the two countries.
Iranian political analyst Mostafa Khoshcheschm told Al Jazeera that the new US sanctions intended to create an "economic onslaught" were a "political show" of intimidation. 
Liu said that by resorting to an "economic strangulation" tactic after miring itself in a fruitless military quagmire over Iran, the US has laid bare its practical predicament and strategic dilemma, and seemingly running out of cards.
Citing sources, CNN reported earlier this month that the US military has exhausted nearly 80 percent of its interceptors for a key missile defense system as senior US military commanders are warning that the Pentagon's munitions stockpile is "dangerously low."
Faced with depleted ammunition stockpiles and insufficient military‑industrial capacity, and amid growing domestic criticism of its Middle East policy, the White House has opted for tough economic measures against Iran, Liu said. "Less costly than military coercion, such moves help Washington strike a tough posture before voters and shun political risks from further military escalation," said the expert.
There is, however, an increasingly obvious paradox in Washington's economic warfare against Iran: the tighter the sanctions, the tighter global energy supplies become, and the higher costs borne by American consumers and businesses, the expert added. 
。

二 | 可他在1965年做的一件事，比战场上的冲锋更让人佩服。    那年夏天，韩先楚回到湖北红安老家。

三 | 红安是有名的将军县，可将军回来看到的不是风光，而是问题。

四 |     他走进一个公社，发现干部名单密密麻麻，数了数，竟然有好几十人。一个公社才多少人口？这么多干部，平时都干什么？        韩先楚当场就坐不住了，把公社领导叫来，说得很直白：“干部太多了，要精简。

五 | ”公社领导问减到多少合适，韩先楚回了一句：“精简到老百姓不叫苦为止。”    这句话很朴素，却说到了根子上。干部多，开销就大，开销大，负担就压在老百姓头上。韩先楚虽然是带兵的人，可算这笔账比谁都清楚。    但让韩先楚没想到的是，他说完以后，下面一点动静都没有。后来他到江西上高县视察部队，顺便了解地方情况，发现干部数量同样惊人。

六 | 他多次向有关方面反映，都石沉大海。    韩先楚脾气上来了，干脆直接给毛主席写了一封信，把看到的情况一五一十说了。    信里没有拐弯抹角，核心就一条：地方干部队伍太庞大，老百姓负担太重，必须精简。

七 |     毛主席收到信后，没有当成一般的群众来信处理。

八 | 他安排人去湖南湘潭调查，结果发现，一个县城竟然有900多名干部。

九 |     这个数字让毛主席很意外。按照当时的实际需要，一个县百把人足够办事，多出来的都是老百姓在养。

十 |     后来毛主席到杭州，听华东局汇报工作。

十一 |         汇报开始前，他突然提起了韩先楚的来信，说：“韩先楚是个实事求是的人，他对我帮助很大。”    这句话让在场的人一时摸不着头脑。

十二 | 等毛主席把信的内容一说，大家才明白，这是要借这件事敲打地方。    毛主席当场提出要求：必须立即开展精简干部工作，而且要快。    这不是第一次提精简。早在抗战时期，边区政府就推行过精兵简政，目的就是节省民力、提高效率。    到了1965年，这个问题再次摆上桌面，说明机构臃肿不是一时现象，需要反复纠治。

十三 |         韩先楚这封信，得罪人吗？肯定得罪。

十四 | 精简干部，就是动一部分人的饭碗。    他完全可以选择不说，反正他是军事干部，地方的事与他关系不大。    但他没有装看不见。他回乡看到的问题，就是老百姓天天面对的问题。    一个将军，能替种田的人算账，这比打一场胜仗更有意义。    毛主席对韩先楚的评价，也说明高层需要听真话。韩先楚不说漂亮话，只讲实际情况。

十五 |     这种作风，在今天依然重要。干部队伍不在于人多，而在于能不能办事、办多少事。    如果一堆人坐在机关里，问题却没人解决，那精简就是应该的。    韩先楚从战场到地方，始终没变的是那股实在劲儿。    他看到问题不绕弯，写信不粉饰，这正是“实事求是”四个字的具体体现。    这样的将军，值得后人记住。    #优质好文激励计划#返回，查看更多。

Current article:http://j7o.pisezuibanzoukou.cyou/fu4gkdk/20260826/1844903.html

Published on:11:31:49